I'm interested to see the over all preference in length for synthetics, feders, and cutters as far as longswords are concerned. The competition style feders tend to be longer than the surviving swords in museums that were used in medieval battlefields and combat.
Though the shorter end of the longsword spectrum may have trouble with some techniques in the KDF system, out side of the competition scene a sword slightly below 50" does provide maneuverability and better point control, especially while in close, or when the wielder is not particularly tall. The longer swords, 52"+, obviously have reach, allowing for maneuvers while in the bind that a shorter sword would not.
Please share your opinions, thoughts, ideas, personal experience/preference, or complete disdain for the topic (lol).
Though the shorter end of the longsword spectrum may have trouble with some techniques in the KDF system, out side of the competition scene a sword slightly below 50" does provide maneuverability and better point control, especially while in close, or when the wielder is not particularly tall. The longer swords, 52"+, obviously have reach, allowing for maneuvers while in the bind that a shorter sword would not.
Please share your opinions, thoughts, ideas, personal experience/preference, or complete disdain for the topic (lol).